The Long Goodbye Blu-ray Review

Robert Altman’s The Long Goodbye, adapted from the Raymond Chandler novel, is quite possibly one of the most marvellous, compelling and intelligent American crime thrillers of all time. Starring an excellent Elliot Gould as Philip Marlowe, a private detective with a lot of time on his hands and few clients to work for, he becomes embroiled in a murder mystery involving his friend, Terry Lennox (Jim Bouton), who was accused of killing his wife.

One evening Lennox appears at Marlowe’s apartment demanding that his friend drive him to Tijuana without any explanation, which Marlowe does. It is only the next day that something appears to have gone amiss when the police turn up at Marlowe’s apartment and arrest him for helping Lennox flee the country – because they suspect that he murdered his wife. After days of questioning and being banged up in jail, they release Marlowe on the basis that Lennox really did murder his wife and that his body was found near the border after an apparent suicide. Marlowe does not accept that his friend really did this awful thing and believes the death to be something more than a suicide.

Once out, Marlowe is hired to help find drunk Hemingway type writer, Roger Wade (Sterling Hayden) by his wife, Eileen (Nina van Pallandt). The audience soon find out that Wade had checked himself into a nearby facility for the rich and famous,

for his addiction & drinking issues but is now being held against his will after wanting to go back home. Alongside this, Marlowe finds some money sent to his apartment (from Lennox, before his death) – this is a red herring as he is about to be attacked by gangster, Marty Augustine (Mark Rydell) and his group of muscle (including a young Arnold Schwarzenegger) as apparently Lennox owed them money and Marty believes Marlowe knows the whereabouts of the cash.

These three stories work in tandem together and lead Marlowe to a surprise that no one could have expected, with an explosive ending. What this noir does so beautifully is satirise the times on which it is based. The story, originally from Chandler’s novel, has been updated to the 70’s when the film was made and looks on at a culture of self obsession and celebrity – where your face is recognisable and money will get you anywhere. This is beautifully and shockingly represented during one of the many conversations between Marty and Marlowe. To show how serious he is about getting the money, he attacks the face of his girlfriend, rather than Marlowe – he damages her face and yet continues to stay with her afterwards because he truly loves her. Furthermore, an incredibly dark scene is during one where he is convinced Marlowe is wearing a wire & he tells every man in the room to strip down to their pants – whilst incredibly homoerotic, this is also Altman’s vision of stripping the layers and looking deeper for meaning in this dark crime story.

Furthermore, the first sequence of the film is simply so masterful, introducing Gould’s character, Marlowe. He wakes when his cat wants something to eat and he continues to chat with cat for at least the first ten minutes of the film as there is no one else around to keep him company. When he tries to trick the cat into eating a non-label brand of cat food, his pet isn’t interested and instead, he has to leave for the 24 hour market to check to see whether they have the label brand in stock because this is all his cat will eat. Already the audience is introduced to this incredible sense of humour and satire, which darkly clouds throughout the whole film – his cat is even aware of labels and is ‘cool’ to eat! When he leaves for the market, his neighbours, a group of half naked, hippie young women are holding one of their parties (probably aided by some drug or other) and they ask Marlowe to bring back brownies for them. This entire sequence is so seductive in nature to the audience and really makes them enjoy spending time with Marlowe who seems both funny and intelligent.

Aided by a great, emotive soundtrack and incredibly skilled filmmaking, which really brings the audience into the story and intimately alongside the range of characters, The Long Goodbye is an ode to crime thriller long lost. The style and tone of the 50’s, mixed with the satire of the 70’s, which we saw long last through the 80’s and into the 90’s; forecasting an impending yuppie culture, Altman’s The Long Goodbye keeps you guessing till the very end.

About The Author

4 Responses

  1. David Purcell

    This movie, although one of the less bizarre of that witling Altman’s cinematic fiascos, is, and will always remain, a supreme insult to the memory of Raymond Chandler and to the spirit of ‘The Long Goodbye’. I read an interview with Altman before the release of this film in which he jeered at Chandler and at the concept of and in particular the ‘schoolboy spirit of Marlowe’.. Altman’s supreme insult was to cast Elliott Gould as Marlowe, as disdainful and humorous as casting Don Knotts as Superman. To be fair, the rest of the cast is uniformly excellent and unlike other Altman films the dialogue can actually be heard and understood. This movie has a few virtues but only someone who has no love or understanding of the Marlowe canon could say this is either worthy of or respectful to its spirit.

    • Ollie.Charles

      Hi David,

      Thanks for your comment and your understanding of Chandler and the character of Marlowe. I can quite openly admit I’ve little knowledge on Marlowe’s character and the history behind the writing but my review was based on my viewing of Altman’s film, which as you can see I enjoyed and got a lot from it. I am a fan of Altman and do believe and stand by what I said in the review of this film despite his interpretation of Chandler’s novel.


  2. Jon O'Brien

    I’m in complete agreement with David; the film is a travesty.

    And I’m amazed that anyone would be crass enough to make a comment like “Starring an excellent Elliot Gould as Philip Marlowe…” without having any basis on which to found such a gushing pronouncement.

    Gould would only have been ‘excellent’ had his performance faithfully portrayed Marlowe. Which it did not. It portrayed an intelligent and complex man of integrity and probity as a flippant slob. A course of action Altman paralleled in his desecration of, arguably, Chandler’s finest novel. His film so utterly twisted the story that only some warped motive, such as the one suggested in David’s post, could explain why he bothered to pretend it had anything to do with the book.

    Altman set out, not for the only time, to denigrate and besmirch, not to create, which explains why I felt dirty after having watched this piece of rubbish you rate so highly in your ignorance.

  3. Ollie.Charles

    Thanks Jon for your comment as well on this film – it is interesting to see how opinions differ indeed and as I explained, my review is based on the viewing of the film itself rather than it’s connections (be they weak or otherwise) to the original text. I do take your point about my introduction, talking about Gould portraying Marlowe – I felt I enjoyed the character of Marlowe as portrayed in the film rather than any other interpretation of the character be they from another film or Chandler’s writing.

    I would be interested now in seeing the differences between the film itself and the source text, but stand with my review and my opinions based on plainly Altman’s work itself rather than anything else.

    On the other hand, it is so wonderful to see Chandler’s fans, standing up for the original character and air their views on this portrayal.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.